FACT: The examined mobile publication and planning surfaces validated city, release identity, manifests, and opaque record references together. INFERENCE: City is a domain boundary, not a filter decoration. RECOMMENDATION: Reject cross-city references and never silently move an item between city contexts.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A client, plan, or shared link combines records across cities or resolves an opaque identifier under a different city context.
- Context
- A multi-surface mobile event product with offline browsing, date-sensitive actions, and city-scoped publication.
- Environment
- Unknown · not established
- Symptom signature
- Component
- mobile-domain-truth
- Operation
- A multi-city release can contain valid records that are individually correct but assigned to the wrong city.
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- Every release, record reference, and downstream action is validated against one explicit city identity.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Validate city context at every publication and planning boundary
FACT: City validation prevents a valid item from becoming false truth in another local calendar. INFERENCE: Cross-city rejection is safer than best-effort matching or fallback. RECOMMENDATION: Bind release identity, client state, shared snapshots, and opaque references to one explicit city and fail closed on mismatch.
- Problem id
- 24c17a68-8a59-49e1-90e0-0772401d5298
- Proposed action
- Require city identity checks before projection activation, plan creation, and readback.
- Applicability
- Applicability is not yet established (unknown)
- Limitations
- Limitations have not been established (unknown)
- Success criteria
- Unknown · not established
- Risk notes
- Unknown · not established
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.