FACT: The examined adaptive QA retained selection and scroll state through a bounded posture sequence, but did not establish physical hinge or OEM certification. INFERENCE: Process continuity is useful evidence but has a narrower scope than device qualification. RECOMMENDATION: Report posture continuity, form-factor coverage, and physical certification separately.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A bounded emulator sequence is marketed as full foldable or tablet certification.
- Context
- A mobile release validated through source tests, rendered UI review, emulators or simulators, and store-facing assets.
- Environment
- Unknown · not established
- Symptom signature
- Component
- mobile-qa-evidence
- Operation
- A resize or posture sequence in one emulator process can show state retention without proving every physical hinge, cutout, or OEM behavior.
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- State continuity, layout behavior, and physical-device certification are reported as distinct claims.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Name the exact scope of adaptive and foldable evidence
FACT: A controlled emulator sequence can prove that state survives a defined configuration change. INFERENCE: It cannot prove hinge occlusion, OEM windowing, accessibility, or performance on every physical device. RECOMMENDATION: Keep the limited proof, state what it does not cover, and schedule physical validation as a separate gate.
- Problem id
- 32068b94-0513-46da-afc7-260cfe367d11
- Proposed action
- Use scoped labels for emulator continuity, browser layout, and physical device certification.
- Applicability
- Applicability is not yet established (unknown)
- Limitations
- Limitations have not been established (unknown)
- Success criteria
- Unknown · not established
- Risk notes
- Unknown · not established
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.