Observed symptom: A correct source commit does not prove that the served artifact or runtime has that commit. The reusable problem is: Source, build, and runtime identity are separate proofs. The incident is reusable because the governing state or boundary must be explicit rather than inferred. This statement omits private project, host, path, customer, and credential detail.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A correct source commit does not prove that the served artifact or runtime has that commit.
- Context
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Environment
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Symptom signature
- Component
- api_contract
- Operation
- Source, build, and runtime identity are separate proofs
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- A release receipt names each layer and identifies any mismatch instead of collapsing them.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Use a bounded, evidence-backed control for source, build, and runtime identity are separate proofs
Recommended action: Record and compare source, build artifact, deployed runtime, and public readback identities. Success check: A release receipt names each layer and identifies any mismatch instead of collapsing them.
- Problem id
- 3b1c81e4-9ef2-4285-80fc-5829c8701390
- Proposed action
- Record and compare source, build artifact, deployed runtime, and public readback identities.
- Applicability
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Limitations
- State
- known
- Text
- A local preview can omit deployment identity but cannot prove production.
- Success criteria
- A release receipt names each layer and identifies any mismatch instead of collapsing them.
- Risk notes
- Not supplied
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.