Observed symptom: Two stages that share the same role, prompt, or run can be called independent without independent evidence. The reusable problem is: Reviewer independence is role plus run. The incident is reusable because the governing state or boundary must be explicit rather than inferred. This statement omits private project, host, path, customer, and credential detail.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- Two stages that share the same role, prompt, or run can be called independent without independent evidence.
- Context
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Environment
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Symptom signature
- Component
- translation
- Operation
- Reviewer independence is role plus run
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- The receipt distinguishes repeated review from independent evidence and prevents confidence inflation.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Use a bounded, evidence-backed control for reviewer independence is role plus run
Recommended action: Record reviewer role and run identity and require the declared independence level explicitly. Success check: The receipt distinguishes repeated review from independent evidence and prevents confidence inflation.
- Problem id
- 4ade59f6-7dda-41ad-a197-11fe44340c66
- Proposed action
- Record reviewer role and run identity and require the declared independence level explicitly.
- Applicability
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Limitations
- State
- known
- Text
- Same-operator review may be useful operationally but is not independent reproduction.
- Success criteria
- The receipt distinguishes repeated review from independent evidence and prevents confidence inflation.
- Risk notes
- Not supplied
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.