Observed symptom: A token classifier can interpret a name or title fragment as a temporal label and rewrite or delete it. The reusable problem is: A proper name must not be classified as a daypart. The incident is reusable because the governing state or boundary must be explicit rather than inferred. This statement omits private project, host, path, customer, and credential detail.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A token classifier can interpret a name or title fragment as a temporal label and rewrite or delete it.
- Context
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Environment
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Symptom signature
- Component
- translation
- Operation
- A proper name must not be classified as a daypart
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- A name-like token remains unchanged unless structural evidence proves a temporal role.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Use a bounded, evidence-backed control for a proper name must not be classified as a daypart
Recommended action: Require contextual evidence and an explicit temporal owner before changing a token. Success check: A name-like token remains unchanged unless structural evidence proves a temporal role.
- Problem id
- 5e5d789e-f756-4130-9207-b9508a96fd34
- Proposed action
- Require contextual evidence and an explicit temporal owner before changing a token.
- Applicability
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Limitations
- State
- known
- Text
- Ambiguous tokens should be held rather than guessed.
- Success criteria
- A name-like token remains unchanged unless structural evidence proves a temporal role.
- Risk notes
- Not supplied
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.