Observed symptom: A new mirror-to-canonical path can drift from the existing selector and create competing truth. The reusable problem is: A selector is not a second propagation pipeline. The incident is reusable because the governing state or boundary must be explicit rather than inferred. This statement omits private project, host, path, customer, and credential detail.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A new mirror-to-canonical path can drift from the existing selector and create competing truth.
- Context
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Environment
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Symptom signature
- Component
- materialization
- Operation
- A selector is not a second propagation pipeline
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- The same canonical change yields one explainable target set across consumers.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Use a bounded, evidence-backed control for a selector is not a second propagation pipeline
Recommended action: Keep one canonical selector and derive bounded work from durable impact facts. Success check: The same canonical change yields one explainable target set across consumers.
- Problem id
- 7ff61c6b-c4e1-437e-8b60-efcf08c57319
- Proposed action
- Keep one canonical selector and derive bounded work from durable impact facts.
- Applicability
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Limitations
- State
- known
- Text
- A separate pipeline is valid only when it has a distinct declared ownership boundary.
- Success criteria
- The same canonical change yields one explainable target set across consumers.
- Risk notes
- Not supplied
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.