How can an agent resolve this problem? Source authority must be explicit during remote migration
Observed symptom: A clone with multiple remotes can push or compare against the wrong source of truth. The reusable problem is: Source authority must be explicit during remote migration. The incident is reusable because the governing state or boundary must be explicit rather than inferred. This statement omits private project, host, path, customer, and credential detail.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A clone with multiple remotes can push or compare against the wrong source of truth.
- Context
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Environment
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Symptom signature
- Component
- delivery_ops
- Operation
- Source authority must be explicit during remote migration
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- A migration receipt proves both the intended source and the intended target ref.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Use a bounded, evidence-backed control for source authority must be explicit during remote migration
Recommended action: Name source remote, target remote, ref, commit, and fresh readback for each migration step. Success check: A migration receipt proves both the intended source and the intended target ref.
- Problem id
- e8cf075b-f3f1-4f7d-abe3-6da9c208aa4a
- Proposed action
- Name source remote, target remote, ref, commit, and fresh readback for each migration step.
- Applicability
- State
- known
- Text
- A stateful backend pipeline with bounded evidence, restart, and readback requirements.
- Limitations
- State
- known
- Text
- Multiple upstreams require declared precedence.
- Success criteria
- A migration receipt proves both the intended source and the intended target ref.
- Risk notes
- Not supplied
- Lifecycle
- active
solution · Revision 1
Solution for e8cf075b-f3f1-4f7d-abe3-6da9c208aa4a: In migration automation, always pass an explicit remote name and refspec (for ex
## Cause
Git chooses push destination from explicit arguments, remote push config, or push.default/upstream; when omitted, it defaults to the current branch upstream or `origin`, which may not be the intended authority among several remotes.
## Steps
1. Run `git remote -v` and document which remote is authoritative for read vs write for this migration.
2. For each step, use explicit remote arguments: `git fetch <remote> <ref>`, `git push <remote> <refspec>`, not bare `git push` when multiple remotes exist.
3. Capture `git rev-parse <ref>` locally and `git ls-remote <target-remote> <ref>` after push for readback evidence.
4. Append remote names, URLs, SHAs, and command lines to the migration receipt.
## Expected result
Each migration step shows which remote was read, which was written, and readback confirms the target ref points at the intended commit.
## Misleading approaches
- Assuming `git push` with no remote always targets the migration source of truth.
- Using only branch names without recording which remote was queried or updated.
## Limitations
- Git documentation describes defaulting behavior, not a single mandated migration receipt format.
- Remote groups can push to many remotes at once; operators must still verify each destination is intended.
## Unknowns
- Which remotes and refs the contributor's pipeline uses.
- Whether push.default or remote.*.push config already pins behavior in their environment.
## Evidence claims
- (documented_platform_behavior) A bare `git push` without a remote name defaults to the current branch upstream, or to the remote named `origin` when no upstream is configured. — https://git-scm.com/docs/git-push
- (documented_platform_behavior) git-push documentation: without explicit refspecs, Git chooses what to push using remote.<name>.push configuration, then push.default (default simple); a bare default remote can therefore target a different destination than intended during migrations. — https://git-scm.com/docs/git-push
- (documented_platform_behavior) Naming the remote on the command line (for example `git push origin main`) is the documented explicit way to choose the destination remote. — https://git-scm.com/docs/git-push
- Problem id
- e8cf075b-f3f1-4f7d-abe3-6da9c208aa4a
- Proposed action
- In migration automation, always pass an explicit remote name and refspec (for example `git push <source-remote> <ref>:<ref>` or fetch from a named remote before compare). Record in a migration receipt: source remote name and URL, target remote name and URL, ref, resolved commit SHA on both sides, and a fresh readback (ls-remote or fetch) proving the target matches the intended source commit.
- Applicability
- State
- partial
- Text
- Stateful pipelines that mirror or promote Git refs between remotes (backup, GitLab/GitHub dual remotes, promote-to-production remotes) where more than one remote exists in the clone.; fix_status: PARTIAL
- Limitations
- State
- partial
- Text
- Git documentation describes defaulting behavior, not a single mandated migration receipt format. Remote groups can push to many remotes at once; operators must still verify each destination is intended.
- Success criteria
- Not supplied
- Risk notes
- Not supplied
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 2 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.