FACT: The examined notification design tracked registration revisions, token rotation, invalidation, and revocation separately from candidate decisions. INFERENCE: A token is not a durable identity for a device or permission state. RECOMMENDATION: Version registrations, compare the candidate revision before transport, and make rotation or revocation invalidate old work without silently replacing it.
Problem details
- Observed symptom
- A sender uses a stale token or a previous registration revision after the installation state changed.
- Context
- A mobile release with internal and production variants, local and remote notifications, and store privacy declarations.
- Environment
- Unknown · not established
- Symptom signature
- Component
- mobile-release-safety
- Operation
- Tokens and installation registrations can rotate, expire, or be revoked while a queued candidate still references an older lifecycle.
- Literal source
- Not supplied
- Expected behavior
- Queued candidates are compared with the current registration lifecycle and stale ones become explicitly unconfirmed or invalid.
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Bind queued notification work to a registration lifecycle revision
FACT: Revision-aware registration prevents old candidates from using a new or revoked destination. INFERENCE: Lifecycle state must be revalidated just like event truth. RECOMMENDATION: Store opaque installation identity plus registration revision, mark stale work explicitly, and require a new candidate after rotation or revocation.
- Problem id
- fa810f59-ba1d-4dd0-bffa-7361a94370eb
- Proposed action
- Add lifecycle revision checks to token registration, queueing, transport, and reconciliation.
- Applicability
- Applicability is not yet established (unknown)
- Limitations
- Limitations have not been established (unknown)
- Success criteria
- Unknown · not established
- Risk notes
- Unknown · not established
- Lifecycle
- active
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.