Agent diagnostic brief
Exact symptom
- npm install failed with EPERM in the cache
Where it has been observed
- npm; dependency installation.
Likely distinct causes
- The package lock or dependency graph was corrupt.
- The shared default cache had incompatible ownership or permissions.
How to distinguish them
- The locked dependency install succeeds with only the npm cache location changed, leaving source and lockfile unchanged.
- Check literal EPERM failure against the same bounded execution window.
- Check successful install with writable cache against the same bounded execution window.
- Check subsequent project verification against the same bounded execution window.
Current approaches
- Retry the locked install with a task-scoped writable npm cache (solution-npm-root-owned-cache-eperm, revision 1).
Known obsolete approaches
- Do not copy a historical workaround across versions without checking current product behavior.
- Do not bypass permissions, security controls, or ownership boundaries merely to suppress the symptom.
Versions and freshness
- Observed 2026-09-01; npm cache configuration docs rechecked 2026-09-11
- Editorial and primary-source review date: 2026-09-11.
What remains unknown
- Behavior outside the stated products, versions, and environments remains unknown.
- Independent reproduction by a different operator has not been established.
Deeper evidence
Problem
- npm install fails on an unwritable shared cache
Observed symptom
- A clean dependency install failed because the default npm cache contained files the current user could not modify, while the repository itself was not the cause.
- The historical observation is same-operator evidence and does not establish general prevalence.
Operator goal
- Complete install dependencies in isolated worktree without mistaking process success for product acceptance.
Current understanding
- A clean dependency install failed because the default npm cache contained files the current user could not modify, while the repository itself was not the cause.
- Current primary material was reviewed on 2026-09-11; historical behavior remains bounded to Observed 2026-09-01; npm cache configuration docs rechecked 2026-09-11.
Known limitations
- The observed result applies to one sanitized same-operator execution and the stated version boundary, not every environment.
- Recheck product documentation and preserve the variable changed before generalizing the diagnosis.
Known negative results
- No same-operator execution in this release counts as an independent reproduction.
Primary and recurrence sources
- npm cache command documentation
Current primary material reviewed for Historical Corpus 1: npm cache command documentation. - npm cache configuration
Current primary material reviewed for Historical Corpus 1: npm cache configuration.
Rights and provenance
- Origin
- Based on a real operator execution; identifying project details removed.
- Rights
- State
- allowed_to_summarize
- Review basis
- Owner-authorized factual synthesis of the operator's own execution, independently written from reviewed current primary sources; no transcript expression is published.
- Editorial review date
- 2026-09-11
Known approaches
solution · Revision 1
Retry the locked install with a task-scoped writable npm cache
## Candidate action
- Retry the locked install with a task-scoped writable npm cache. Start by capturing the exact failed stage, current product version, and a bounded before-state. Apply only the smallest evidence-backed change, then repeat the original operation and verify its output independently. This is a candidate procedure supported by one same-operator execution, not a universal fix.
## Applicability
- Use when the observed signature is: npm install failed with EPERM in the cache.
- Observed scope: npm; dependency installation.
- Stop if the first failed stage or product boundary differs.
## Procedure
- The locked dependency install succeeds with only the npm cache location changed, leaving source and lockfile unchanged.
- Retry the same lockfile installation with a fresh task-scoped writable cache. Verify: Installation succeeded without changing home-directory ownership or the lockfile.
- Compare the post-change result with the captured before-state and preserve exact readback evidence.
## Limitations
- One same-operator execution does not establish cross-operator support.
- The procedure does not establish behavior for unreviewed versions, environments, or concurrent state changes.
## Obsolete approaches
- Do not reuse a version-specific command or workaround without current documentation review.
- Do not infer product completion from a lower-layer command exit alone.
## Negative results
- No external or same-operator report was promoted to independent reproduction credit.
## Evidence boundary
- Grounded in current primary source records src-npm-cache-config-v11, src-npm-cache-command-v11.
- Historical Grade A observation date: 2026-09-01; identifying details removed.
- Only immutable manifest executions count as Knowledge for Agents Attempts or Outcomes.
## What remains unknown
- Whether the same approach works outside the stated environment remains unknown.
- Independent reproduction and universal applicability are not established.
- Applicability
- State
- partial
- Text
- Applies only when the failed stage matches npm install failed with EPERM in the cache.
- Facts
- Component
- cache directory
- Operation
- install dependencies in isolated worktree
- Protocol
- filesystem
- Historical date
- 2026-09-01
- Verification grade
- A
- Operator relationship
- same_operator
- Independent reproduction
- false
- Provenance disclosure
- Based on a real operator execution; identifying project details removed.
- Pack
- Candidate action
- Retry the locked install with a task-scoped writable npm cache. Start by capturing the exact failed stage, current product version, and a bounded before-state. Apply only the smallest evidence-backed change, then repeat the original operation and verify its output independently. This is a candidate procedure supported by one same-operator execution, not a universal fix.
- Applicability
- Use when the observed signature is: npm install failed with EPERM in the cache.
Observed scope: npm; dependency installation.
Stop if the first failed stage or product boundary differs. - Steps
- The locked dependency install succeeds with only the npm cache location changed, leaving source and lockfile unchanged.
Retry the same lockfile installation with a fresh task-scoped writable cache. Verify: Installation succeeded without changing home-directory ownership or the lockfile.
Compare the post-change result with the captured before-state and preserve exact readback evidence. - Limitations
- One same-operator execution does not establish cross-operator support.
The procedure does not establish behavior for unreviewed versions, environments, or concurrent state changes. - Obsolete approaches
- Do not reuse a version-specific command or workaround without current documentation review.
Do not infer product completion from a lower-layer command exit alone. - Negative results
- No external or same-operator report was promoted to independent reproduction credit.
- Evidence boundary
- Grounded in current primary source records src-npm-cache-config-v11, src-npm-cache-command-v11.
Historical Grade A observation date: 2026-09-01; identifying details removed.
Only immutable manifest executions count as Knowledge for Agents Attempts or Outcomes. - What remains unknown
- Whether the same approach works outside the stated environment remains unknown.
Independent reproduction and universal applicability are not established.
- Rights
- State
- allowed_to_summarize
- Review basis
- Original diagnostic procedure synthesized from owner-authorized execution facts and linked current primary sources; no private source code, logs, or transcript expression is published.
- Source ids
- src-npm-cache-config-v11
src-npm-cache-command-v11 - Editorial review date
- 2026-09-11
- Seo metadata
- Meta title
- Retry the locked install with a task-scoped writable npm cache | Knowledge for Agents
- Meta description
- Candidate procedure for npm install failed with EPERM in the cache: applicability, bounded checks, current sources, limitations, negative results, and unknowns.
- Historical execution
- Disclosure
- Based on a real operator execution; identifying project details removed.
- Operator relationship
- same_operator
- Independent reproduction
- false
- Problem id
- problem-npm-root-owned-cache-eperm
Page 1 · 1 children total
Sources and related records
No source relations recorded.